In An Outline of
Esoteric Science, Steiner describes a class of Satanic beings
which he calls "Jupiter man," which will not reach their
"human" stage of evolution until the next, or "Jupiter"
incarnation of our solar system. These beings fell behind
evolutionarily and had to dwell "on" Jupiter for a while until
the Moon was withdrawn from Earth. Now, these beings
dwell in Earth's subphysical realm and are controlled by Satan,
they intermingle with the will-forces of our etheric body [the
lowest level of our nonphysical being], and they watch for weak
spots through which to penetrate into and seize control over
our minds.
The following excerpts
which characterize this class of beings are from a November,
1919 lecture by Steiner, which can be found in The Archangel
Michael: His Mission and Ours [available through various
on-line bookstores]. The passage from which these
excerpts were drawn begins on page 167.
-------------------------
Something different is
happening now. The subhuman beings WHOSE CHIEF
CHARACTEISTIC IS AN IMPULSE SIMILAR TO OUR HUMAN WILL [an
aspect of our etheric body] are now emerging from below as it
were.... These are beings from the realm of Ahriman. p
169
It is a significant
finding of spiritual-scientific research, one that needs to be
taken very, very seriously, that we have entered the phase of
Earth's evolution when those beings will assert themselves who,
in the subsequent Jupiter phase of Earth's evolution, will have
advanced to human form. p 167
These beings find
vulnerable areas to attack in human beings WHEN THE LATTER
YIELD TO UNBRIDLED INSTINCTS AND IMPULSES AND FAIL TO STRIVE TO
UNDERSTAND THEM CLEARLY. p 174 (emphasis added)
These actually subhuman
beings are powerful far beyond their own nature [due to
Ahriman's influence].... Their effect is so compelling that
those whom they ENSLAVE are unable, in their human weakness, to
resist unless they strengthen themselves spiritually. p
170
People DO NOT NOTICE
THESE BEINGS ENTERING THEIR SOULS, and even their bodily
natures. Once within us, these beings attract to
themselves all that has remained Luciferic [i.e. egotistical in
the lower sense, and deceitful] and unpermeated by Christ in
us. They can successfully seize hold of those
elements. p 170 [emphasis added]
-----------
The preceding excerpt
differentiates this mode of possession from the mode by which
nature-spirits of destruction, or demons, take possession of a
soul. Demons seize control by stimulating "sensuous
urges," whereas these "Jupiter men," based on my understanding
of Steiner's descriptions, seize control over the person's will
and thinking more directly, and have a more purely Satanic
influence without the intense demonic drive to torment,
torture, injure or kill humans or animals directly,
although the influence they have on society can be more
devastating.
Once a person becomes
possessed, they become excellent liars, because the beings
which take possession act as conduits for Ahriman, who imparts
extreme cleverness (not always apparent), lies and
materialistic ideas. (Lucifer warps perception, allowing
us to perceive falsely, but Ahriman feeds lies and
materialistic ideas to us.) This much is shared with
demonic possession.
Not everybody is at
risk of being possessed by this class of beings. The
following excerpts, which are also from The Archangel Michael,
describe the mentality of those who are at risk. There is
additional detail in the book.
"The whole way these
men [German Generals Tirpitz and Ludendorff] think is exactly
the same as the way Caesar thought." [p171] "What matters
is that neither carries the true Christian impulse in his heart
and soul." [p172 - the Christ impulse is independent of a
person's outward religion]
"It is a particularly
frightening problem. Spiritual-scientific research
reveals that the darkened consciousness of these individuals
was like an open door: the will-beings ["Jupiter men"]
TOOK POSSESSION OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS of these individuals by
means of their dimmed awareness ..., ACTING THROUGH IT out of
their own consciousness." p 169 [emphasis added]
By "darkened
consciousness," I assume that Steiner was referring to a state
of consciousness produced by putting someone who had not
absorbed much of the Christ Impulse into a position of making
decisions which affect many people. He cited the example
of General Ludendorff making a decision, after his troops had
taken the town of Liege during WWI, which caused his state of
mind to change to that of Caesar, "a darkened consciousness
that opens the door for the Ahrimanic world to enter [p
172]." I surmise that Ludendorff yielded to the luciferic
influence which contributes to egotism, since that was Caesar's
most prominent characteristic.
One reason why those
who have absorbed a significant amount of the Christ Impulse
are protected from this form of possession is that the Christ
Impulse occupies the central region of the soul, corresponding
to the heart, and it shields the upper, conscious region of the
soul from the influence of the Jupiter beings which approach
from below:
"[W]hen the
Christ-Impulse takes hold of the middle level of consciousness
... the Ahrimanic forces cannot get through this middle
stratum, cannot ... drag down the powers of the
intellect. Everything depends on this." Rudolf
Steiner, The Archangel Michael, p 173
In order to shed more
light on the process of becoming possessed, and on how Lucifer
and Ahriman work together, I include a few quotations from
Evil, a collection of lectures by Steiner [available through
various on-line bookstores]:
----------
"Ever since the
Lemurian epoch ... [luciferic] forces made our inner life the
focal point of their attack, by infiltrating our desires,
impulses, and passions. There were two consequences of
this: we were able to become free ... [from] the sway of
divine, spiritual beings.... But ... we also had to
accept our potential for evil arising through our passions,
emotions and desires." p 100
Lucifer's influence was
primarily one towards freedom, enabling [mankind] to overcome a
passive submission to random external powers, allowing them ...
a capacity for acting independently. p 103
But ... [Lucifer's]
influence ... dragged them down ... [and] made their desires
and actions, their whole being in fact of a lower nature than
it would have been [otherwise]." p103
"How, then, does the
luciferic influence act? It penetrates into the astral
body and is thus able to work upon all three 'bodies' of the
human being - astral, etheric and physical.... In the
etheric it brings about IMPULSES OF FALSEHOOD AND LYING." P103,
emphasis added
"[T]hrough Lucifer
there arises selfishness in the astral body, lying and
falsehood in the etheric body, and sickness and death in the
physical body." p 104
"The ahrimanic
influence is therefore a result of the luciferic: Lucifer takes
possession of [i.e. penetrates and influences] us from within,
and we are as a result susceptible to attack from without [by
beings from Ahriman's subphysical realm]. p 100
------------------------------
To summarize: it is
possible for those who have not absorbed the Christ-Impulse
(one aspect of which is agapic love, and which is not exclusive
to those who call themselves Christian) to become possessed
without striving to do so. All that seems to be required
to begin the process in such people is to yield to "unbridled
instincts and impulses," by which I assume he was referring to
the animal passions and the Luciferic impulses of egotism and
falsehood.
Venice, A Portrait of
Possession
"[A] person possessed
by Ahriman ... wishes to have as many people under his thumb,
and to rule over them - if he is clever enough - by using and
manipulating their weaknesses." Rudolf Steiner, Evil, p
84
"To use the briefest
possible characterization, let it be said that Lucifer is the
being who tells man that he is "like the gods, knowing good and
evil," [i.e. AS intelligent and wise as the gods] as the Book
of Genesis puts it, and Ahriman the being who tells man that he
is "only man," with no divine element in him...." [2]
" . . . the soul does
not exist without a body and yet is not itself a kind of body.
For it is not a body, but something which belongs to a body,
and for this reason exists in a body, and in a body of
such-and-such a kind."
from On the Soul
by Aristotle
[In other words, "human
soul" is a characteristic, such as the genetic code, of "the"
substance out of which a human is made. This would mean
that there is nothing to a human besides physical substance
which has this "human soul" characteristic, and that each type
of animal consists of substance with a certain "animal soul"
characteristic.]
"You see, this battle
[between Michael and Ahriman] was already there in the Cosmos,
BUT IT BECAME SIGNIFICANT ABOVE ALL SINCE THE EIGHTH OR NINTH
CENTURY, when the Cosmic Intelligence [a type of intelligence
which I gather is what Satan wants to get his mitts on]
gradually fell away from Michael and his hosts and came down to
humanity on earth. It BECAME ACUTE only when the
Spiritual or Consciousness Soul began to unfold in humanity at
the beginning of the fifteenth century." [3] [emphasis
added]
Venice, the so-called
"Serene Republic" which was neither, was a stage in the
metamorphosis of the Roman Empire into the British Empire of
today. It became the main vehicle for the
Devil's war on mankind's mental and spiritual evolution,
which began in earnest at about the same time that man attained
the consciousness-soul and began to threaten the power of the
would-be heirs to the Roman Empire. This war, also known
as the Conservative Revolution, is probably a lot more
conservative and evil than the typical supporter of that
movement ever imagined.
The American Almanac
website [4] is a rare source of truth about Venice. In
one of the articles there, I found a description of Venice
which has striking parallels to Steiner's description of
satanic possession:
"I think it is
important here, to reference the prime Satanic evil that Venice
really is. There are two works of art which deal most
effectively with the methods of Venice. They are The Jew of
Malta by Christopher Marlowe and The Ghostseer by Friedrich
Schiller.
"In both masterpieces,
we see a portrait of pure evil, where there is no right or
wrong, just corruption. The key to this is Aristotle, and it
should not come as any surprise that it was the University of
Padua, run by Venice, that trained the elite of Venice
explicitly in Aristotle. Aristotle rejects Plato's method of
successive approximations of perfection, which bring one closer
to the Creator. For Aristotle, the Creator has nothing to do
with the unfolding of the universe and the continuing creation.
For Aristotle, man's progress is a mere illusion and we are
always infinitely far from the Creator. For Aristotle, there is
no right or wrong, because there is no knowable truth. For
Aristotle, there is only ethics but no morality, and ethics is
only a matter of convention. In The Ghostseer Schiller captures
this in the most profound way. He shows that the essence of
Venice is that it is always on both sides of every issue--but
THE ESSENCE OF ITS METHOD IS CORRUPTION: FIND THE ADVERSARY'S
WEAKNESS, AND THEN CORRUPT HIM. This is Satanic. It is
evil for evil's sake. Its method is TO DEGRADE HUMANITY AND TO
TAKE DELIGHT IN THAT. We will recount how this Venetian evil
took over England and created the New Age. [emphasis added]
[5]
The following by
LaRouche shows the form in which the influence of Venice on
philosophy has come down to the present:
The Legacy of Paolo
Sarpi
The present
national-security concerns of the United States are properly
understood only when it is recognized, that today's problems of
national security are often derived from the influence of that
Servite monk and mathematician, Paolo Sarpi, who maintained
factional supremacy in Venice from 1582 until his death in
1623. [Note that Steiner indicated above that Satan's war on
human consciousness "became acute" about 150 years before Sarpi
became influential.] Sarpi is the father of all the
mathematical and social theory which came to be known as The
Enlightenment. Many among today's security problems may occur,
either as the effect of Sarpi's influence upon the behavior of
other nations, or of our own, or a combination of both
effects.
It was Sarpi who
launched the process of "cloning" the British and Netherlands
monarchies as the future "doges" of a ruling, global financier
oligarchy. It was Sarpi, as mathematician and controller of
such assets as England's Sir Francis Bacon and of Galileo
Galilei, who established the axiomatic basis for both today's
generally accepted, mechanistic, Galileo-Descartes-Newton-Euler
faction in mathematical physics, and also the generally
accepted assumptions underlying the social theory IMPOSED UPON
TODAY'S UNIVERSITIES. Under the rubric of "social theory," are
included empiricist political-economy, the Hobbes-Locke current
in law, and the most widely accepted varieties of psychology
and utopianism of the English-speaking world (and,
elsewhere).
In the preceding pages,
we have summarized the case, that human nature is distinguished
from the characteristics of all lower species, by virtue of
those developable, not-entropic qualities of the individual
person, upon which society depends, absolutely, for the
continued survival of our species.
The followers of Sarpi,
notably including Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, David Hume,
Voltaire, Pierre-Louis Maupertuis, Giammaria Ortes, Adam Smith,
Jeremy Bentham, and John Stuart Mill, premised today's dominant
social theory, upon a directly opposite, bestialized notion of
"human nature." It is fairly said, that the latter dogma is
based chiefly upon apotheosis of the "Seven Deadly Sins," as
the core of its teaching. This is generally known, variously,
as the empiricist, British, Liberal, materialist, positivist,
behaviorist, or psychoanalytical mind-set. Despite the
secondary distinctions among the latter varieties of doctrine,
they rest, each and all, upon a common species of underlying
assumptions. Those assumptions are false; their implications
for social practice, are wicked.
As noted, above,
during the middle of the Eighteenth Century, the influence of
Venice, throughout Europe, was centered in a network of salons
set up under the direction of Abbot Antonio Conti (1677-1749).
That Conti is best known as the sponsor of the scientific
reputation which he manufactured for a man who would otherwise
be recognized today only as an obscure dabbler in black magic,
Isaac Newton. Conti was also, similarly, the sponsor of
Voltaire, of Physiocrat Dr. François Quesnay, and many
other Enlightenment notables of that time. He served during the
first half of that century as a leading controller for the
foreign intelligence services of Venice. During the middle of
that century, the network of salons established by him,
launched a campaign for what was sometimes described as
"Newtonian social theory." As a result of this, Maupertuis and
the same Giammaria Ortes who wrote the book plagiarized by
Thomas Malthus, were among the leading pioneers in what became
known later as empiricist and materialist dogma; today, Adam
Smith, Jeremy Bentham, and John Stuart Mill, are among the most
widely known exponents of that "Newtonian social
theory."
The significance
of the use of the term "Newtonian social theory" and its
variants of that period's usages, is the notion, advanced by
Maupertuis and Ortes, that the mechanistic quantification of
Thomas Hobbes' attributes for human nature, could extend the
domain of Newton's Principia into the field of social theory,
producing a "calculus" of social theory. Hence, we have the
satanic doctrine of "freedom," derived from Hobbes, Locke, and
Mandeville, embedded as the cornerstone of Adam Smith's
"Invisible Hand" dogma in particular, and Liberal political and
social dogma in general.[6] (emphasis added)
LaRouche
continues:
"Honest ignorance put
aside, the immediate root-cause for all of the economic
problems of each and all nations, and of today's mankind in
general, is literally an occult dogma introduced to modern
Europe at the close of the Sixteenth Century. The author of
that doctrine was the mephistophelean Paolo Sarpi, in his time
the most powerful figure of Venice. This was the same
Sarpi who trained his personal lackey, Galileo Galilei, in
certain new principles of mathematics. These were the
principles which Galileo taught, in turn, to his own student,
Thomas Hobbes. These are the principles passed down to the
present day under the interchangeable technical terms of
empiricism, positivism, and philosophical liberalism.
The most
influential figures on economics policy among the English and
French, Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries' followers of
Sarpi, were John Locke in his hedonistic principle of property,
Bernard Mandeville in defense of unchecked licentiousness,
David Hume, François Quesnay's pro-feudalist,
anti-nation-state cult of laissez-faire, Adam Smith's
explicitly anti-U.S.A. dogma of "free trade," and satanic
Jeremy Bentham's CULT-WORSHIP OF UNIVERSAL DEGENERACY. [7]
(emphasis added)
William James, whom the
Establishment holds up as one of the greatest American
philosophers, is yet another variation on Sarpi. He,
along with others, founded an "American" branch of philosophy
cynically named Pragmatism (see James's Pragmatism, which summarizes James's bestial
notion of man). LaRouche had the following to say about
James:
"In all of James' work
flowing into his general dogma of pragmatism, he was a follower
of the modern Manicheanism of Mandeville, in the same sense
that Charles Darwin professed his published work to be nothing
other than his fraudulent imposition of the dogma of Thomas
Malthus upon the reading of nature. [8]
Robert McDermott, a
brilliant scholar who has written books on both James and
Rudolf Steiner, wrote an article entitled William James and
Rudolf Steiner [9], from which I gather that he too considers
James to have been clueless, although he was more subtle about
it.
I pondered James's
involvement in the "psychical research" movement, and luckily
ran across a chapter in Anton Chaitkin's book Treason In
America, entitled The Spooks. It appears to me that James
was actually trying to devise methods to regress mankind's
consciousness, and excuses for doing so, which reflects a
Luciferian influence. (The international scope of this
effort is especially apparent throughout The Lucis
Trust: Satanism and the NWO, which is posted
to this website.) His interest in "religious experiences" seems
to have been motivated by this search for excuses for
irrationality. He also believed that nitrous-oxide
intoxication provided useful insights, and lumped it in with
"mystical states." Although he "experimented" with it
quite a lot, the only effect reflected in his work is brain
damage.
Bernard, de
Man-deville: Sarpi's Satanism Surfaces
"Do What Thou Wilt"
shall be the whole of the Law.
Aleister
Crowley
Friedrich von Hayek,
the patron-saint of the Conservative Revolution who considered
himself to be a philosophical liberal (i.e., like Locke, a
variation on Sarpi), effusively praised one Bernard Mandeville,
a.k.a. Bernard de Mandeville:
"Von Hayek argued in
his Mandeville lecture that Mandeville's poem, The Fable of the
Bees, was perhaps THE GREATEST PHILOSOPHICAL TREATISE EVER
COMPOSED. He credited Mandeville with inspiring Adam Smith's
argument for the unbridled free market." [emphasis
added][10]
The following is from
an ad for The Enlightenment's 'Fable' by E. J. Hundert, an
Establishment authority-figure on history and philosophy.
Hundert's book was published by no less than Cambridge
University Press, so they obviously want us to take Mandeville
seriously, not as the "satirist" they often claim he
was.
The apprehension of
society as an aggregation of self-interested individuals,
CONNECTED ONLY BY BONDS OF ENVY, COMPETITION, AND EXPLOITATION,
IS A DOMINANT MODERN CONCERN, but one first systematically
articulated during the European Enlightenment. The
Enlightenment's Fable approaches this problem from the
perspective of the challenge offered to inherited traditions of
morality and social understanding by the Anglo-Dutch physician
[who ADVOCATED basing society on the aforementioned "bonds,"
which actually fragment society or prevent one from getting
started], satirist and philosopher, Bernard Mandeville.
Mandeville's infamous paradoxical maxim 'private vices, public
benefits' profoundly disturbed his contemporaries, while his
Fable of the bees HAD A DECISIVE INFLUENCE on David Hume,
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith and Immanuel Kant. Professor
Hundert examines the sources and strategies of Mandeville's
SCIENCE OF HUMAN NATURE [barf!] and the role of his ideas in
shaping eighteenth century economic, social and moral theories.
[11]
I'd be willing to bet
that Professor Hundert doesn't mention EVERY influence
that went into Mandeville's philosophy. In particular, I
doubt he mentions the one mentioned in following
excerpt:
"Mandeville was widely
known to be THE leading figure among Britain's
Satan-worshipping secret societies, which proliferated rapidly
among the degenerate financier elite. They became notorious
after George I's accession to the throne in 1714--typified by
the infamous Hell-Fire clubs--and flaunted their political
ascendancy following the devastating financial blowout of the
South Sea Bubble in 1720." [12] [emphasis added]
In the "person" and
"philosophy" of Bernard Mandeville (to whom LaRouche refers
above, as a variation on Sarpi), the Satanism implicit in the
oligarchy's "philosophy" became explicit, for a while - until
he was transformed from a Satanist into a "satirist."
Mandeville was an inner-circle member of the Hell Fire Clubs,
which was a network of Satanic cults disguised as dens of
iniquity, where people could be conditioned to surrender to
their "instincts and impulses," a prerequisite to becoming
satanically and/or demonically possessed. It seems to me
that "Hell-Fire" refers to these Luciferic "burning
desires."
Various websites
report that Benjamin Franklin was seen in at least one Club,
but what they don't say is that he was spying on his enemies,
the British oligarchy. He might have been a womanizer,
but he was no Satanist.
Just as is the case
today, when someone became sufficiently degraded, and perhaps
non-demonically possessed, he would be introduced to the ugly
secret at the core of the Clubs: satanic ritual human
"sacrifice," which is partly intended to facilitate demonic
possession, although the participants are often given the
impression that it will be beneficial. For instance, the
Franklin Coverup indicates that the cult-members are under the
impression that it conveys some kind of "power," when in fact,
it causes loss of power.
Many children who lived
in the vicinity of some of the Hell-Fire Clubs (which I
gather were in secluded areas) disappeared over the years
shortly before Satanic festivals, and in some cases were said
to have gone "missing with the fairies." Considering that
fairies and demons are both nature spirits, I suspect that the
"missing with the fairies" line was intended as a hint of the
horrible truth.
However, the oligarchy
has swept the overt Satanism of this period and of Mandeville
under the rug, while retaining Mandeville's "philosophy,"
which, besides purveying Satanic influence, is actually an
appeal for people to abandon themselves to their lowest nature,
and thus open themselves up to non-demonic possession.
Note the similarity to Crowley's sick dictum, "do what thou
wilt" (and thou shall wilt).
A TV show named The
World's Most Frightening Places once did a segment on Crowley's
Thelema ("Will") Abbey, during which a camera quickly
panned over something on a wall inside the abbey. I
single-stepped through that scene, and found that it read
something like "stab your demonic smile to my brain."
This seems to support what I've concluded about Satanism: that
its core function is the facilitation of
possession. Interestingly, according to Dope, Inc.,
"Crowley was the tutor of Aldous Huxley, the prophet of MIND
CONTROL." [13] [emphasis added]
In The Search for the
Manchurian Candidate, which is widely considered to be one of
the primary sources on "mind control," I found a tantalyzing
potential hint at a connection between LSD, "mind control" and
possession:
[I]n the 1960s, LSD
would escape from the closed world of scholar and spy, and it
would play a major role in causing a cultural upheaval that
would have an impact both on global politics and on intimate
personal beliefs. The trip would wind up, to borrow some
hyperbole from the musical Hair with "the youth of America on
LSD."
The
counterculture generation was not yet out of the nursery,
however, when Bob Hyde went tripping: Hyde himself would not
become a secret CIA consultant for several years. The CIA and
the military intelligence agencies were just setting out on
their quest for drugs and other exotic methods TO TAKE
POSSESSION OF PEOPLE'S MINDS. THE ANCIENT DESIRE TO CONTROL
ENEMIES THROUGH MAGICAL SPELLS AND POTIONS HAD COME ALIVE
AGAIN, and several offices within the CIA competed to become
the head controllers. [emphasis added] [13a] [Some drugs
apparently drive out the higher soul, leaving a void which
Satanic influences can fill.]
I also found references
to "mind control" in connection with the Bohemian Grove, which
is apparently a government-protected sanctuary for
Satanists, and which is the site of a famous annual
recruitment program.
Careful consideration
of the relevant passage of Mandeville's "poem," The Grumbling
Hive, upon which The Fable of the Bees was based, shows that
Mandeville's "philosophy" explicitly advocates abandoning
oneself to one's lowest nature, because it supposedly
contributes to the common good:
Vast numbers thronged
the fruitful Hive;
Yet those vast Numbers
made 'em thrive;
Millions endeavouring
to supply
Each Other's Lust
[instinct] and Vanity [egotism]....
THUS EVERY PART WAS
FULL OF VICE,
YET THE WHOLE MASS A
PARADISE;
Flatter'd in Peace, and
fear'd in Wars
They were th' Esteem of
Foreigners....
Such were the Blessings
of that State;
THEIR CRIMES CONSPIRED
TO MAKE 'EM GREAT;
AND VIRTUE, who from
Politicks Had learn'd a thousand
Cunning Tricks
[lies],
Was, by their happy
Influence,
MADE FRIENDS WITH
VICE:
And ever since THE
WORST OF ALL THE MULTITUDE
DID SOMETHING FOR THE
COMMON GOOD
Mandeville was
apparently more intent upon misleading people into surrendering
to their lowest nature than he was with being scientific,
because his crude rhyme, which is the foundation of his
"literary" and "philosophical" edifice, is a total
fantasy. A beehive has a group soul, and as a result,
individual bees have no free will, and thus no ability to sin,
and they are essentially robots dedicated to the building and
maintaining the hive. Nor have they any need for a
culture to develop their souls, as do humans. So, the
"great philosophy" upon which the Conservative Revolution was
explicitly based by its founder, is actually a plug for
feudalism! (This gives new meaning to the title of
Hayek's most famous book, The Road to Serfdom.)
Hayek: "Free Trade"
Based on Mandeville
Hayek didn't merely
praise Mandeville - he attributed a fundamental tenet of his
so-called economic theory directly to one of Mandeville's
"sociological" principles:
"Hayek's great work all
flows from the fundamental vision of classical economics and
political science [feudalism] which Hayek terms 'spontaneous
order.' This evolutionary principle (originally enunciated in
1705 by Bernard Mandeville) ascribes the development of society
and economy to what Adam Ferguson -- colleague of David Hume
and Adam Smith -- called 'human action but not human design,'
but more commonly known as Smith's 'invisible hand.'"
[14]
"Spontaneous order,"
"human action but not human design," and the "invisible hand"
are just excuses for abandoning the overall organization of
society to the oligarchy, which is "invisible" because their
media paint them out of the virtual reality they feed us.
(Note that Ludwig von Mises' magnum opus is entitled Human
Action - implying "but not human design.") The "hidden
hand" then seizes the reins of large-scale economic activity to
destroy civilizations or to prevent them from developing in the
first place.
In a letter to his
father, John Foster Dulles admitted the real purpose of "free
trade" and provided a candid view of the oligarchy's
mind-set:
"Laws should not ...
have for object, the doing away with all poverty and distress;
but rather in so DETERMINING THE CONDITION OF COMPETITION
[rigging the "free market"] that THE MOST DESIRABLE [as defined
by the oligarchy, which evidently considers itself to be Mother
Nature, as in "natural selection"] find themselves best adapted
to succeed." [15]
The letter goes on and
on, and it's just the most disgusting confession of a
Caesar-like mind-set I've ever read. It just so happens
that Dulles had connections to a high-level occult group in
Switzerland. [16] It's little wonder, then, that Dulles
was a key player in bringing Hitler to power, and that his
brother was a key player in flooding the country with LSD, and
in covering up the JFK assassination. Treason in America
contains an extensive section on his career of high-level
treason.
Mandeville
De-viled
As I mentioned
previously, the Establishment has tried to prevent people from
noticing the connection between its "philosophies" and
Satanism, and this includes sweeping Mandeville's Satanic
allegiance under the carpet. You can see this for
yourself by searching the web under "Bernard Mandeville" and
"'Bernard Mandeville' Satan." In the first case, you will
find hundreds of references, and in the second, a mere handful,
only a couple of which actually state that he was a
Satanist.
The modern versions of
Mandeville's "black-ops" activity can be seen in various types
of Satanic cults, including some which were essentially clones
of the Hell Fire Clubs, down to the name. As in his day,
participants in the perverse activities connected with Satanic
cults include some of the most "respectable" people:
"In this article, the
first of an ongoing series, we present a dossier of some of the
principal institutions and individuals behind this evil "New
Age'' movement. The reader will learn, how behind the
oh-so-nice U.N. brochures and talk about "peace,'' some of the
leading figures of this grouping have been exposed as
practicing the most obscene homosexual and child pornography
rituals imaginable.
"Take the notorious
case of Canon Edward West, the coordinator of the American
association of the Most Venerable Order of St. John [the Order
proper is the most elite on the planet, with a member of the
British Royal Family, the Duke of Gloucester, at the helm - its
website, www.saintjohn.org, includes a photo of Queen Elizabeth
in "the robes of Sovereign Head of the Order"].
Eyewitness accounts indicate that during the 1980s, he was a
frequent participant in obscene sexual rituals at homosexual
S&M clubs in Manhattan, including the
Mineshaft [interesting
name, considering that mine shafts lead to the "underworld,"
the home of "Jupiter men" and Lytton's "Coming Race" who are
powered by vril/veil/evil] and the Hellfire Club (named after
an 18th-century English secret Satanic society). Favorite
"entertainment'' at the Mineshaft included having children
urinate on the patrons. In the mid-1980s, the club was shut
down, following an investigation by the New York Police
Department.... [17]
The Ultimate Evil by
Maury Terry mentions that offshoots of the Process Church -
which came from England, and is evidently descended from the
Hell Fire Clubs - attract new members by throwing wild parties
which include sex and drugs. Such recruitment efforts are
typically targeted at college students for various reasons,
including their strong sex drives, their gullibility, and their
typically new-found independence from the protective influence
of their parents. Probably not coincidentally,
Mandeville's libertine philosophy is also targeted at college
students.
So, on the one hand,
the Establishment openly pushes Mandeville's Satanic philosophy
on college students while fanatically hiding his outright
Satanism, and on the other, they entice college students with
the "Hell Fire Club" variety of Satanism which incorporates
Mandeville's "evil is good" gambit, while fanatically hiding
his and their connections to it. Such "Hell Fire"
activity is carried out in a wide variety of forums in which
Establishment personnel participate.
Satanic possession as a
prerequisite for Establishment minions
"This considered, the
kingdom of darkness, as it is set forth in these and other
places of the Scripture, is nothing else but a confederacy of
deceivers that, to obtain dominion over men in this present
world, endeavour, by dark and erroneous doctrines, to
extinguish in them the light, both of nature and of the gospel;
and so to disprepare them for the kingdom of God to
come."
from Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes [18]
Hobbes should have
known, since he was part of that confederacy, and a homosexual
and Hell-Fire brand of Satanist to boot.
His deceit in that particular paragraph was in pretending not
to be part of it, among other things.
Hobbes was at least
telling the truth when he called the Establishment a
confederacy of deceivers, by which he meant that they're the
best bunch of liars on the planet (a veritable Liars From Hell
Club). They even seem to enjoy it. It's their
weapon of choice in their war against mankind, although when
the lies have weakened their target to a certain point, they
deliver the coup de grace with violence. This approach is
succinctly expressed by the following quotation from a letter
by Sebastian Giustinian, Venetian ambassador to England, to the
Doge (the head of the Venetian oligarchy) in 1519:
"The nature of the
time, most serene Prince, requires this: an observance of an
old proverb, which enjoins kissing the hand we are unable to
cut off.'' [19]
Since deceiving people
is such an important part of the Establishment's strategy, they
naturally want the best liars possible - and nobody makes a
better liar that someone who is Satanically possessed.
This is because a possessed person is a channel through which
high-ranking Satanic beings, whom Steiner categorizes first and
foremost as highly intelligent beings of falsehood, can perform
actions in the physical world. Recall that a previous
quotation by Steiner characterized this state by saying that
Jupiter men "took possession of the consciousness of these
individuals ... ACTING THROUGH IT OUT OF THEIR OWN
CONSCIOUSNESS." Another way of saying this is that the
Jupiter men act as puppet strings controlled by Satan.
Considering this, and
that I have presented evidence that the Establishment has
created organizations and programs to cause people to become
demonically possessed, it should come as no surprise to learn
that there is evidence that the Establishment has done the same
to cause people to become Satanically possessed.
In fact, it's even more
likely that they have done the latter, since becoming
non-demonically possessed can be done without participating in
activity which is obviously Satanic, and it can serve as a
precursor to demonic possession. It a way, it's even more
hideous, because it's so insidious, and because it's easier for
a Satanically possessed person to appear respectable,
attain a powerful position, and use it to undermine
civilization.
The Whirlpool to Hell,
Disguised as a Jacuzzi
The following
quotations from Rudolf Steiner indicate the general nature of
programs designed to elicit possession:
'These beings find
vulnerable areas to attack in human beings WHEN THE LATTER
YIELD TO UNBRIDLED INSTINCTS AND IMPULSES AND FAIL TO STRIVE TO
UNDERSTAND THEM CLEARLY." [20] [emphasis added]
"How, then, does the
Luciferic influence act? It penetrates into the astral
body and is thus able to work upon all three 'bodies' of the
human being - astral, etheric and physical.... In the
etheric it brings about IMPULSES OF FALSEHOOD AND LYING." [21]
[emphasis added]
Any activity sanctioned
by the Establishment which tends to cause people to abandon
themselves to their instincts and impulses, including
philosophies and other incentives which encourage people to
lie, should be considered in this light. Establishment
"philosophies" which lead to the conclusion that there is no
ultimate meaning, and thus that anything and everything goes,
are the leading edge of this corruption. For instance,
the media constantly provide "evidence" to "support" Darwinism,
which is the supposed scientific basis of materialistic
philosophies. In fact, it's a religion based on what
Steiner identifies as a Satan-inspired "suspicion of
materialism."
LaRouche's article
entitled The Theory of the Satanic Personality, which I
stumbled onto in the course of writing this and related essays,
goes into considerable detail on the effects of philosophy on
the psychological process of becoming possessed. It
contains many striking parallels to what I've written about
demonic possession, although it seems to vacillate between
treating demons as psychological constructs and as separate
entities.
At the risk of
oversimplifying LaRouche's argument, I will try to succinctly
express the essence of its philosophical aspect. He seems
to be saying that all philosophies which lead someone down the
road to possession are based on the notion that the physical
world is all there is, or that there is at least an
unbridgeable chasm between the physical world and God.
Thus, life is ultimately meaningless, and anything goes.
Compare this with what
Steiner identifies as fundamental influences of Satan and
Lucifer. He stated that Ahriman/Mephistopheles/Satan
"entice[s mankind] into regarding everything in his environment
as material, with the result that he does not see through this
material world to its true, spiritual foundations." [22]
The resulting attitude that anything goes then gives free rein
to Lucifer's influence, which debases our feelings and desires,
and gives us the impulse to lie. If we act on these base
desires and impulses, the door is opened to the aforementioned
satanically-controlled Jupiter men, and a downward spiral
begins. This pattern can be seen throughout Establishment
"educational" institutions, and the Dionysian sex-drugs-rock
counterculture which tends to reduce people to animals.
Thanks to the
counterculture, entire societies have been converted into the
equivalent of outer circles of Satanic cults. The most
pervasive elements include the media-"culture" which
brainwashes us, insults us, dumbs us down, and debases our
morals.
Once you understand the
basic elements, you will realize that this kind of stuff goes
on all the time, and with the blessings of the Establishment,
despite their pretenses of being anti-Establishment.
Extreme Dionysian
Groups
The network exposed by
the Franklin Coverup is a prime example of this type of
group. I would categorize it as the outer circle of a
Hell-Fire type of Satanic cult, with aspects of the typical
inner circle. (The book refers to more secretive groups
connected to this outer group, and I assume they comprise the
Satanic inner circle.) Drug consumption and perverted
sexual activities including pedophilia are par for the course
within the outer circle. I think it's safe to say
that nobody who would commit pedophilia has absorbed much
of the Christ impulse, meaning they're especially vulnerable to
Satanic possession. In fact, I am tempted to assert that
pedophilia, because it is so contrary to the human
instinct to protect and nurture children, is in itself a sign
of possession. But then, it could also just be an extreme
perversion of the sex drive, so I can't be
certain.
Cultivating the Impulse
to Lie
In order to embark on a
career of helping to lead mankind to its destruction by
deliberately telling big lies, an Establishment minion must at
least initially consider himself to be part of a group which is
inherently superior, typically on the basis of genetics or
supposed intelligence, and thus qualified to play God and
worthy of being spared the destruction they plan for the rest
of civilization. But after telling such lies with a
feeling of smugness for a while, he no longer requires such
rationalizations, because he will have become host to the enemy
of mankind. (Actually, the cultivation of an ability to lie
goes hand-in-hand with SRA, so it's a moot point whether lying
by itself is sufficient to lead to possession. But,
as Steiner said, lying represents death and destruction in the
spiritual world.)
This strategy of
transfering loyalty from mankind in general to some
Establishment subgroup can be seen throughout the
Establishment's minion-recruitment programs. The Nazis
are a prime example, and Anton Chaitkin's Treason In America
provides another example:
To administer this
horror and carnage [the colonization of India], the British
East India Company [a "privatized" front for the "Venetian
faction" within the oligarchy] felt the need for a new species
of employee, trained in a new type of "economics" [free
trade"], who by his training could be relied upon to commit
murder on an unprecedented scale without pity and without
remorse. This kind of training would involve the selection of
candidates with criminal propensities, AND INCULCATION WITH THE
MOST DEGRADED CONCEPTS OF RACIALISM AND IRRATIONALISM.
To this end the
Company founded two colleges in England. [p 275, emphasis
added]
The annual gaterhing at
the Bohemian Grove, which has similar goals but more subtle
means of achieving them, combines the Dionysian aspect with the
loyalty-transfer aspect, which are intended to induce the
participants to abandon themselves to their Luciferic impulses,
including the impulse to lie. So, I find it very
interesting that it originally targeted the media of the
time. What better way for the Spirits of Darkness to
spread their confusion?
There are many
other such organization which combine various elements
mentioned here, but behind them all, and behind the programs to
lure people into unwittingly becoming possessed, lies the truly
ancient pagan/luciferic/satanic priesthood at the core of the
British oligarchy: The Cult of Isis.
