After watching an episode of MASH about "evil spirits" wreaking havoc in the camp after a sort of scare-crow was moved, it occurred to me that it might be loosely based on reality.  So, I did a little checking, and found the following:

[Episode] 108. Exorcism  (U-815)
     December 14, 1976
     Written by Jay Folb; story by Gene Reynolds and Jay Folb
     Directed by Alan Alda
     Guest Stars:  Virginia Ann Lee, James Canning, Phillip Ahn 

After Potter orders Radar to move a Korean spirit post believed to ward off evil spirits, things mysteriously begin to go wrong.  When an old Korean man (Philip Ahn) is brought into camp for medical attention, he refuses surgery unless the end spirits in the camp are exorcised.  A priestess is brought in who exhibits her dance and her bells and chants.  All is well, and Radar returns the spirit post to its original position.

from M*A*S*H FAQ: Episode Guide

The following helps to determine the setting of the 4077th MASH unit:

"From the Korean War until 1970, Camp Mosier, near Uijongbu City, South Korea, was the home of the 43rd MASH. The unit was the subject of the book by U.S. Army surgeon Capt. H. Richard Hornberger, which inspired the popular movie and television series of the same name."

from Budget constraints could be the downfall of historic MASH unit's Korea home
 

Although the Earth Grid map on my site doesn't depict Korea very accurately, another which I have, which exaggerates Korea's features, indicates that a leg of the EG crosses Korea just south of the 38th parallel, which is approximately where Uijongbu City is located.  So, it is entirely feasible that this location would be a hotbed of elemental spirits.  Whether they would have the effects depicted in the episode, or be banished through the measures indicated, is questionable.  But the existence of such a potent source of elementals in that area casts new light on the purpose of the Korean war and the ongoing conflict.  We have just recently learned of mass slaughter of suspected Communists by South Korean and/or American forces, and the subsequent 50-year cover-up.  This raises the possibility  that a major motive for war is to stimulate intense negative emotions, such as fear and hatred, which just so happens to feed the power of black magicians.  If so, then the "war on terror" (reign of terror) would serve this function magnificently. 

This also naturally raises the issue of Satanism in South Korea, and it didn't take long to find evidence of it.  For example:

"The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has learned that JEONG Phil-ho has been handcuffed and been in a straitjacket for 466 days, from 08 March 2000 until 18 June 2001, in Gwangju and Mokpo prisons in the Republic of Korea (ROK). This cruel and inhuman punishment has directly exposed the problem that prisoners' rights have been severely violated and ignored for a long time in the ROK. The AHRC notes with great concern that Mr. JEONG was kept in a straitjacket for the first 26 days and only untied one or twice a week in total afterwards.
[...]
In fact, this case is not exceptional, and shows the severe violations against prisoners in Korea. Many cases of inhumane treatment and punishment against prisoners have been reported by human rights organization in Korea. It is not surprising that during its inaugural year (2002), 30.9 per cent of human rights violation complaints received by the NHRC of Korea related to detention facilities and the abuse of disciplinary power and tools of restraint. For the last ten years, annually 8-9 prisoners in solitary confinement have committed suicide and several hundred prisoners have attempted suicide in segregation cell as average. About 22 prisoners every year die because of the lack of medical treatment in Korea. It is evident that the human rights of the prisoners in Korea are now severely threatened.

from REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Torture and inhuman treatment of prisoners must end immediately
 

As in the "war on terror," the ostensible motive for this SRA is "interrogation," and it is said to have produced false confessions in abundance, as has been the case since time immemorial (the notortious myth of Baphomet is a result of the horrible torture of the Knights Templar by Philip "the Fair's" sadistic henchmen - the victims were essentially driven out of their minds and didn't know what they were saying).  So, it would seem that providing an excuse to conduct advanced SRA in an area with a high concentration of elemental beings (including demons) could be the ultimate motive for maintaining the Korean conflict for 50 years.

Posted by fakeapoc at 11:41 AM EDT

Updated: Sunday, August 24, 2008 11:55 AM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

Based on the articles I read about the recent American Psychological Association meeting in Boston (200 protest psychologists' interrogation role , A push to ban psychologists' role in torture, all in attendance agreed that "enhanced interrogation" is interrogation, despite the lack of evidence to support this assertion.  This effectively "justifies" the process in the minds of many Americans, who are still convinced that there is such a thing a "Islamic terrorism," that the US government is waging war on it, that we have captured and interrogated terrorists, and that the process has yielded beneficial information. 

The truth, in my opinion, was expressed in numerical code by "protest" signs.  Just coincidentally, ALL of the signs mentioned in the articles I read can be converted to 11, the number of black magic, or multiples of it.  For example, "Do No Harm" converts to 88, which reflects not only black magic, but its ultimate goal - the 8th Sphere agenda, which "enhanced interrogation" is obviously intended to facilitate.  Also mentioned were the slogans "No Torture," which converts to 29 117, i.e. 11 9 (9/11) or 29 9=38=11 and "No Collaboration," which converts to 29 137 or 11 11.  

What I find most disgusting is groups which claim to be opposed to torture, but give it a back-handed "justification" by calling it "interrogation," while studying its effects and perhaps providing feedback to the torturers to help them fine-tune their diabolical craft.  If so, the only difference between them and those who support the participation of psychologists is their stated position. 

So, the protest and the coverage of it appears to have been choreographed to send both a back-handed "justification" and hints of the hideous actual purpose of "enhanced interrogation."  It's possible that they have "interrogated" a sufficient number of victims into a state of utter insanity to allow them to conduct experiments on how to turn such victims into slaves, and that there will be a show of discontinuing the practice, and perhaps some Congressional grandstanding and a pretense of doing the right thing just before the election. 

Posted by fakeapoc at 8:21 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

"Attorney General Michael Mukasey has appointed a known supporter of the Bush administration’s torture policies as his chief of staff. Brian Benczkowski has previously argued that US interrogators aren’t practicing torture if they are solely acting to prevent an attack and not intending to humiliate or cause harm. In a previously undisclosed letter, Benczkowski writes: 'The fact that an act is undertaken to prevent a threatened terrorist attack, rather than for the purpose of humiliation or abuse, would be relevant to a reasonable observer in measuring the outrageousness of the act.'"

from Mukasey Appoints Torture Backer as Chief of Staff

Oh, Brian, you little devil, you!  Why would you go out of your way to deny that "enhanced interrogation" is SRA, if not for the purpose of taking the opportunity to tell a big lie?

Posted by fakeapoc at 1:07 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

from Police identify Canadian bus attack suspect 
 

TORONTO - A 40-year-old man who witnesses said stabbed and beheaded his seat mate on a Greyhound bus in Canada made his first court appearance Friday, while police offered no motive for the savage attack against the 22-year-old carnival worker.
 
Vince Weiguang Li, of Edmonton, Alberta, has been charged with second-degree murder. He shuffled into the courtroom Friday in Portage la Prairie, Manitoba with his head bowed and feet shackled.

He did not reply when the judge asked him if he was going to get a lawyer, and only nodded slightly when asked whether he was exercising his right not to speak. He was not required to enter a plea.

The prosecutor asked for a psychiatric assessment, but the judge said he wanted to give Li a chance to meet with his lawyer. Li's next court appearance is scheduled for Tuesday.

[end of excerpt]

What, no sensory deprivation?  How about beating him up, roasting or freezing him?  Try stripping him naked,  pouring cold water on him, turning up the A/C, forcing him to breathe toxic fumes, depring him of sleep, sexually humiliating him, siccing some dogs on him, telling him he's going to be sent overseas to be tortured and raped, then interviewed by lawyers who tell him there's nothing they can do, get shot point blank in the back with a shotgun, waterboarded, bombarded by loud "music" for days on end, fed insects and rats, etc, etc, etc.  What?  He's only a murderer who decapitated someone in front of dozens of people?  Oh, I thought he was a Muslim who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time!  Sorry - in that case, let's ask him how he feels about his mother. 

Also note that he was charged with 2nd degree murder, because there was supposedly no premeditation involved.  So, why the hunting knife?

Posted by fakeapoc at 3:49 PM EDT

Updated: Friday, August 1, 2008 6:13 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

from UK torture coverup unravels:

A scathing report from the Joint Human Rights Committee (JHRC) warns that the use of "coercive interrogation techniques" may have been officially sanctioned, despite assurances that troops knew they were outlawed...

[Left: Hogwart's junior on a field trip in Iraq.]

The JHRC report also found that the use of hooding and stress positioning by 1 Queen's Lancashire Regiment in 2003 was based on legal advice received from brigade headquarters. It claims that, at least until the Baha Mousa case came to light, the prohibition on the use of conditioning techniques [conditioning whom, and for what?] "was not as clearly articulated to troops in Iraq as it might, and indeed should, have been".  [And none of them ever wondered whether it was legal - right.]

Legal advice from the military chain of command authorizing torture. How familiar.

Phil Shiner, of Public Interest Lawyers, said: "We are meant to believe that it is just a few bad apples, but the evidence from courts martial and other cases shows that nothing could be further from the truth."      

[end of excerpt]

So, just as with the US Congress, Parliament is putting on an act of being outraged and putting a stop to what is actually SRA.  Congress is still pretending not to notice that, at the end of their show, Bush & Crew sidestepped their "torture ban" with a few slimy signing statements and assertions, such as that "military necessity" trumps any and all laws, treaties, etc.  This means that Bush can simply write some statement and sign it, and it becomes a law higher than the Constitution.  America, meet your new government - same as the really old, pre-Magna Carta government.   

Posted by fakeapoc at 5:03 PM EDT

Updated: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:21 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

"We have to work the dark side, if you will.  We’re going to spend time in the shadows in the intelligence world. A lot of what needs to be done here will have to be done quietly, without any discussion, using sources and methods that are available to our intelligence agencies."  Cheney

"In late 2005, as Senator John McCain was pressing the Bush administration to ban torture techniques, one of the nation's top researchers of stress in SERE trainees claims to have received a call from Samantha Ravitch, the deputy assistant for national security in Vice President Dick Cheney's office. She wanted to know if the researcher had found any evidence that uncontrollable stress would make people more likely to talk."  from Rorschach and Awe by Katherine Eban

"Reports have circulated for some time that the Red Cross examination of the CIA’s highly coercive interrogation regime—what President Bush likes to call “The Program”—concluded that it was “tantamount to torture.” But you write that the Red Cross categorically described the program as “torture.”  from Six Questions for Jane Mayer, Author of The Dark Side By Scott Horton

Where there's a BS blizzard, there's something big to hide, and one of the biggest such storms I've ever seen is the one surrounding "enhanced interrogations."  They're still coming up with new excuses - one of the latest I've seen is that it's secretly intended to prevent Americans from protesting, as if the typical jailhouse horror stories aren't sufficient.  Some of these explanations are good-faith efforts by people who aren't aware of the existence, purpose, and methods of Satanism, and others are intended to distract us from the hideous true motives.  They can say anything without evidence, and it's up to us to disprove it, which is impossible, although they often don't pass the smell test.  Below, instead of torturing you with my scribbling, I'll just list some of the contradictory claims about The Program and make some comments.

I. a) The claim that EI is very effective and quick vs. the fact that "enemy combatants" are routinely abused for long periods of time
   b) The fact that EI is scientific and performed precisely according to certain guidelines vs. the claim that the SRA conducted at Abu Ghraib and other "frat-house from Hell"-prisons is EI

"As the C.I.A. captured and interrogated other Al Qaeda figures, it established a protocol of psychological coercion. The program tied together many strands of the agency’s secret history of Cold War-era experiments in behavioral science.  (In June, the C.I.A. declassified long-held secret documents known as the Family Jewels, which shed light on C.I.A. drug experiments on rats and monkeys, and on the infamous case of Frank R. Olson, an agency employee who leaped to his death from a hotel window in 1953, nine days after he was unwittingly drugged with LSD.)  [One source I've seen, and might be included below, claims he was murdered for threatening to expose the CIA's lethal "experiments," i.e. torture-murder, an advanced form of SRA.]  The C.I.A.’s most useful research focussed on the surprisingly powerful effects of psychological manipulations, such as extreme sensory deprivation [part of the 8th Sphere agenda]. According to Alfred McCoy, a history professor at the University of Wisconsin, in Madison, who has written a history of the C.I.A.’s experiments in coercing subjects, the agency learned that 'if subjects are confined without light, odors, sound, or any fixed references of time and place, very deep breakdowns can be provoked.'

"The C.I.A.’s interrogation program is remarkable for its mechanistic aura. 'It’s one of the most sophisticated, refined programs of torture ever,' an outside expert familiar with the protocol said. 'At every stage, there was a rigid attention to detail. Procedure was adhered to almost to the letter. There was top-down quality control, and such a set routine that you get to the point where you know what each detainee is going to say, because you’ve heard it before. It was almost automated. People were utterly dehumanized. People fell apart. It was the intentional and systematic infliction of great suffering masquerading as a legal process. It is just chilling.'"  [I agree that actual "enhanced interrogation" (psychological torture) is effective quickly - so why have so many "enemy combatants" been "interrogated" for so long?  Perhaps it's necessary to create utter hopelessness in order to have the desired effect.]  from The Black Sites by Jane Mayer

"Welshofer has since used the Nuremberg defense -- THAT HE WAS JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS IN COMING UP WITH 'CREATIVE INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES' to make [Iraqi Maj. Gen. Abed Hamed Mowhoush] talk –- to explain his subsequent actions [which killed Mowhoush]...." [emphasis added - I've often used the phrase "free-form sadism" to describe plain old SRA.]  from Tomdispatch: Alfred McCoy on How Not to Ban Torture in Congress
 

"Instead of the 'old French [advanced SRA] methods' of crude physical torture, most evident among the Saigon police, the Vietnamese, in the words of one CIA trainer, 'had to be re-taught with more sophisticated techniques.'  At the provincial enters, however, physical methods continued to prevail, including electric shock, beatings, and rape."  from A Question of Torture by Alfred McCoy, p 63  [This is included to show that EI is part of a continuum of SRA, which culminates in torture-murder.  However, EI is also intended to serve the 8th Sphere agenda.  It's possible that those undergoing EI are forced to listen to actual torture as part of their psychological torture.]

II.  EI "works" vs. "doesn't work"

"From 1950 to 1962, the C.I.A. ran a massive research project, a veritable Manhattan Project of the mind, spending over $1 billion a year to crack the code of human consciousness, from both mass persuasion and the use of coercion in individual interrogation. And what they discovered—they tried LSD, they tried mescaline, they tried all kinds of drugs, they tried electroshock, truth serum, sodium pentathol. None of it worked.  What worked [for creating the desired form of psychological damage - not brain damage] was very simple behavioral findings...."
[...]
ALFRED McCOY: What they found time and time again is that electroshock didn’t work, and sodium pentathol didn’t work, LSD certainly didn’t work. You scramble the brain.  [i.e. it causes brain damage, not the desired fear and loathing of Earth-life required to drive the higher soul into the 8th Sphere]. You got unreliable information.  But what did work was the combination of these two rather boring, rather mundane behavioral techniques: sensory disorientation and self-inflicted pain.  [Note that he only implied that it works as an interrogation technique.]  from Democracy Now interview of Prof. Alfred McCoy

However, Prof. McCoy's book A Question of Torture makes no bones about the fact that coercive methods are worse than useless for obtaining reliable information:

p 196:  As noted, FBI interrogators found the military's techniques produced little real information and interfered with their own bureau's proven methods of building rapport through long, noncoercive questioning.  "The torture of subjects did not lead to any useful intelligence information being extracted," reports James Corum, a professor at the Army Command and General Staff College.  "The abusers couldn't even use the old 'ends justify the means' argument, because in the end there was nothing to show but a tremendous propaganda defeat for the United States."
 
III.  The widely known fact that EI causes profound, permanent psychological damage, vs. claims by "trained interrogators" that they didn't know:

In the above-mentioned interview, Prof. McCoy stated that "... people who are involved in treatment tell us [that psychological torture is] far more destructive, [and] does far more lasting damage to the human psyche than does physical torture."  His book A Question of Torture states that:

p 9:  [Psychological torture is  devastating, causing damage that lasts longer than the most brutal forms of physical abuse.]  Psychotherapist Otto Doerr-Zegers found that victims suffer "a mistrust bordering on paranoia, and a loss of interest that greatly surpasses anything observed in anxiety disorders."  The subject "does not only react to torture with a tiredness of days, weeks, or months, but REMAINS A TIRED HUMAN BEING, relatively uninterested and unable to concentrate."

p 58:  [Judge Dimitrios Evrigenis of Greece stated that psychological torture can cause] "the disintegration of an individual's personality, the shattering of his mental and psychological equilibrium and the crushing of his will."

And yet, on 7/24/08, a news article entitled 2002 Justice memo OKs CIA interrogation tactics reported that "The Justice Department in 2002 told the CIA that its interrogators would be safe from prosecution for violations of anti-torture laws if they believed 'in good faith' that harsh techniques used to break prisoners' will would not cause 'prolonged mental harm.'"

IV.  Does EI consist of reverse-engineered SERE techniques?

We are told that reverse-engineered SERE techniques form the basis of EI.  However, in my opinion, SERE is watered-down EI.  Both are mind-war, but in SERE, it's only intended to weed out those with psychological foibles who can't take the heat of Special Forces, whereas EI is intended to destroy the mind of everyone subjected to it.  I understand that SERE is being used on an increasingly widespread basis throughout the military, which I think is a big mistake, and possibly part of the program to destroy the US military.

V.  More information on the roots of EI

The U.S. Has a History of Using Torture
By Alfred W. McCoy 

Posted by fakeapoc at 9:21 PM EDT

Updated: Monday, July 28, 2008 8:47 AM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba - The judge in the first American war crimes trial since World War II barred evidence on Monday that interrogators obtained from Osama bin Laden's driver following his capture in Afghanistan.
[...]
The judge, Navy Capt. Keith Allred, said the prosecution cannot use a series of interrogations at the Bagram air base and Panshir, Afghanistan, because of the "highly coercive environments and conditions under which they were made."

from Gitmo judge: No 'coercive' questioning evidence
 

Of all the nerve!  If it's good enough to start a perpetual war which has killed over a million so far, and which could end up destroying civilization, it's good enough to use as the basis to murder a single human being!

Posted by fakeapoc at 1:53 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

"What was missing," Mayer says, "was a discussion of policy -- not just what was legal, but what was moral, ethical, right, and smart to do." Such matters remained on the periphery because "fundamentally, the drive for expanded presidential authority was about power." from a review by Andrew J. Bacevich of The Dark Side by Jane Mayer 

Well, now we know that the monster Cheney's motive for remaining "in the shadows," "without any discussion," had nothing to do with protecting the national security, and everything to do with hiding sub-criminal activity.  He was admitting, in retrospect, that his "war on terror" is a war-crimes spree of such an appalling nature that it cannot withstand any scrutiny, and so must be hidden behind lies, distortions, and dungeon walls.

As his Presidency draws to a close, it appears to me that Cheney is deliberately fading into the background so that by the time he gets out of office, people will forget that he even exists.  Well, God won't forget.  I shudder to think what horrors await him when he leaves this world and faces a justice system that isn't rigged. 

EI started with CIA, not SERE

After reading some recent articles by Tom Hayden about the Phoenix Program, or Operation Phoenix, which was an orgy of Satanism inflicted upon the Indo-Chinese during the "Vietnam War," I compared it to the "war on terror."  There is no simple equivalence, although there is a campaign of murder against the intelligentsia in Iraq, and there have been outbreaks of torture-murder supposedly perpetrated by "sectarian" (which convert to 90, i.e. 6x15 or "666x5") death squads (trained by Special Forces Col. James Steele of Central/South American "counterinsurgency" notoriety, and enabled by veteran death-squad godfather John Negroponte) within the Iraqi police under the watchful eyes of the US occupation.  But there is no video of these hideous deeds, so we really don't know who committed them.  It's possible that "Shiite" monsters committed them, but it's also possible that they were just providing victims for American Satanists.

According to A Question of Torture by Alfred McCoy, "enhanced interrogation" techniques were initially deployed on a significant basis during the Vietnam era.  This indicates to me that the implementation of the 8th Sphere agenda, the goal of which is to drive out the higher soul, was just getting underway, and that the SRA perpetrated in that theater was intended purely to induce people to becoming possessed.  Those who choreographed the war also apparently hoped that by putting soldiers in "atrocity-generating situations" (paraphrasing author Chris Hedges), that they could induce some soldiers to learn to enjoy killing, which aligns the soul with the Satanic beings of the underworld and paves the way to possession.  It is possible to feel good about killing someone out of necessity, without feeling good about killing just anyone.  Someone who is possessed is DRIVEN to harm others by INSTINCT (deeply subconscious drives), and they obtain pleasure from it.  It is their NATURE to attack, like a rabid animal.  They don't need a reason, although they are adept at fabricating excuses.   

I don't agree with the claim that "enhanced interrogation" techniques were created by reverse-engineering SERE techniques originally developed to prepare US soldiers for capture by an outlaw regime such as the Cheney gang.   History shows that the techniques were originally developed to destroy the will, and claiming that they were originally developed to train US soldiers to resist torture strikes me as a false trail designed to hide its true roots, which go back to the founding of the CIA (it was one of the top priorities at the time).  It appears to me that the name of the program (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape) was designed to produce an acronym similar to the acronym SRA, as a hint that it is a form of SRA for Satanists within Special Forces.  There is a risk of causing PTSD, or disloyalty, associated with deliberately inflicting cruelty upon one's own soldiers.  Discipline is one thing, but deliberate cruelty is another.

Posted by fakeapoc at 4:49 PM EDT

Updated: Sunday, July 20, 2008 10:57 AM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

I didn't listen to much of the 6/26/08 House Judiciary Committee hearing into "the torture memos" (which provided legalistic excuses for SRA, which is deliberately cruel, degrading, and humiliating) because the responses by war criminals Addington and Yoo consisted of legalistic excuses for not providing any substantive information (see Contempt of Congress by Dan Froomkin). However, I found the opening statement by committee member Trent Franks to be quite telling.  The gist of his statement was that "harsh interrogation" works, and that it has prevented a lot of terrorism.  Naturally, the "evidence" is classified, so we just have to take his word.  Never mind the fact that the "information" which Bush used as an excuse to invade Iraq turned out to be lies produced by using "enhanced interrogation" on KSM, and that it is therefore unreliable.  The simple fact that it continues to be used despite this experience proves that its advocates have a hidden agenda, and the sheer amount of carefully crafted stonewalling exhibited during this hearing, combined with lies from the committee itself,  proves that they have a tremendous fear of allowing the slightest hint of the truth leaking out.

Posted by fakeapoc at 7:26 PM EDT

Updated: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:55 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Pentagon officials drawing up methods to question suspects after the Sept. 11 attacks consulted experts who taught U.S. troops how to resist harsh interrogation, a Senate committee was told Tuesday.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin said a little-known unit that taught skills of Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) provided a list of interrogation techniques.

from US panel seeks roots of Guantanamo prisoner abuses
 

I won't presume to know the actual purpose of the hearing, but getting to the roots of "enhanced interrogation" wasn't among them.  This has been done already, in such books such as A Question of Torture by Alfred McCoy and articles such as The Gestapo Inheritance by Nat Hentoff.  (The connections between the Bush Reich and the Third Reich have been abundantly exposed elsewhere). 

I found the hearing's choice of SERE as a chief bogeyman to be quite interesting, considering the similarity of SERE to SRA (the actual purpose of "enhanced interroation"), and considering that they are both numerically equivalent to 38, the number of black magic.  Although SRA serves the purposes of black magic, it is more properly an aspect of Satanism, which is a subsidiary/parody of black magic.  This would come as a surprise to most Satanists, who are convinced that they are pursuing the black path, when in fact they're on the path to possession, Satan's top priority.

Posted by fakeapoc at 11:36 AM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink