Topic: Politics
It seems that every Presidential candidate in a "change agent." Bush was one, but we could have done without the change he brought. For a while, I thought it might be fitting to plan on putting Bush and Cheney's graves next to each other, and building a national dance hall on top of them. But most people would rather just forget, unfortunately, because it looks as if we've got another Bush coming down the pike: Hucklebury Fundy or whatever his name is. Either that, or as LaRouche expects, an actual Synarchist financier in the person of the current mayor of New York, who put that slimeball Lieberman back in office after LaRouche nearly got rid of him.
The main "change" seems to be the sudden personality change each candidate undergoes upon becoming President - from optimistic to "pragmatic," as dictated by some contrived "circumstances beyond our control" - i.e. "you lose again, suckers." Is is just a coincidence that "change," when each letter is converted to its ordinal value, converts to 36 or 666 666? Some things just never change.
