|
|
|
Satan's Fake Apocalypse
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Condi razzes Russia, imperils mankind
Topic: Economics
from Bush tells Russia to get out of Georgia: "Rice says the time had come to talk about the consequences Russia should suffer as a result of its actions in Georgia, yet she declined to possible repercussions it could face. "At the end, perhaps the only thing Russia will have proved is that 'they can use their overwhelming regional military power to beat up on a small neighbor,' she said. ["Bring it on - well, not us personally, you dummies, but the American people."] "'I don't think that's actually a very good place from which to proceed on an argument that Russia ought to be considered a responsible member of the international system.'" [end of excerpt] With a Secretary of State who says things like that at a time when LaRouche is warning us that we must cooperate with Russia, China, and India to form a new, just global financial system, why are we worried about terrorists attacking us? This conflict was clearly planned by the British to be unleashed at precisely this time in order to prevent cooperation, and possibly to unleash a world war.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 7:09 PM EDT
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Didn't McCaffrey get Twisted Dick's memo?
I don't know where Gen. McCaffrey gets the idea that this "war on terror" is supposed to have ANY good outcomes. According to McCaffrey: Afghanistan Disaster, Unless We Send in the Engineers, "There is no military solution, McCaffrey writes: 'The atmosphere of terror cannot be countered mainly by military means. We cannot win through a war of attrition.... Afghanistan will not be solved by the addition of two or three more US combat brigades from our rapidly unraveling Army.' [Before the war started, I said that one of its goals would be to destroy our military in many ways. Not only that, but it has destroyed the lives of so many individual soldiers as well. And for what, or rather, whom?] "Instead, McCaffrey argues that, in addition to building up the Afghan security forces, economic measures are also required. He calls for the deployment of a 'five battalion Army engineer brigade... to lead a five year road building effort employing Afghan contractors and training and mentoring Afghan engineers....'" I gather that the good General didn't get a copy of the Cheney-Rumsfeld doctrine issued at the outset of the war. (I find the aspects related to torture and "releasing the fiend within" [fiend, Nietzschean superman, demon, whatever] to be particularly enligntening.) Not that it matters, since Britain, Satan, and their agents are going full speed ahead on their nuclear "Armageddon" project now that their bubble of monopoly-money is collapsing. They can't wait around and risk that Congress will adopt LaRouche's solutions to the crash, despite the best efforts of Nancy Pelosi, the inflatable sex-doll of Babylon, to keep them in line.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 7:10 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:15 PM EDT
Monday, August 11, 2008
Prophecy-fulfiller-in-chief still bringing them on (us)
Topic: Nuclear warfare
There can be no comparison between what Russia is doing (with the overwhelming force which Colin Powell advocates as the best way to win the peace ASAP, instead of dragging it out and turning Georgia into a wasteland) to try to counteract British imperial destabilizations, and the Bush administration's relentless efforts throughout his term to unleash Hell on Earth, starting in Iraq. Bush's warnings toward Russia, dripping with hypocrisy and sanctimony, are intended to provoke conflict, as usual. I would expect nothing less of The War (on mankind) President (6 6 11), who would like nothing more than to be able to take credit for bringing-on the war to end all civilization disguised as "fulfilling prophecy."
Posted by fakeapoc
at 10:21 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
A most convenient war for the British, and Satan
Topic: Nuclear warfare
It would seem that since there's so much resistance to an invasion of Iran, that the British decided to start the world war intended to lead up to "Armageddon" by pulling the trigger on another bomb they have carefully put in place for precisely such a situation. But then, the threats of invading Iran might have been intended to draw our attention away from the actual plan. The media, which has tried to cultivate such a reputation for objectivity after stampeding us into Iraq, is back at it again, stampeding us into a war with Russia, while trying to give the appearance of objectivity, precisely when cooperation with Russia is necessary to avert financial disaster (see Russians decry Western "propaganda" over crisis). Then of course Obama and McCain are making Establishment-approved noises. (Obama's moneybags Soros just happens to have been deeply involved in putting the aforementioned bomb in place.) Can so many "experts' be wrong? Well, they were last time. Why not start listening to LaRouche, instead of Fox (= 666) Noise Channel and the rest of the war party's media, since your life probably depends on it?
Posted by fakeapoc
at 7:46 PM EDT
Seen a Bush-Cheney bumper sticker lately?
You haven't? Little wonder: after 8 years of Bush, everything's collapsing
Posted by fakeapoc
at 10:30 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:33 AM EDT
Saturday, August 9, 2008
The Rain of Terror & the Eighth Sphere
In the course of searching for LaRouche's description of the Beast-man mindset, I ran across 'Shock and Awe': Terror Bombing, From Wells and Russell to Cheney, which I've perused before without recognizing its importance. After reading the article, it became clear to me that the policy of "shock and awe," (which converts to "56 and 29," i.e. "11 and 11," where 11 is the number of black magic) based on the consequences of applying this policy in Iraq, and on passages in the article from a book on the policy, was never intended as just a means of winning wars, but was intended to permanently break the will of as many people as possible, particularly civilians, as a means of implementing the Eighth Sphere agenda of black magic. ("Enhanced interrogation" is also intended to have a similar effect, and has nothing to do with obtaining useful information.) As with Beast-man Bush, when advocates of terror-bombing refer to "the enemy," they're referring to the human race.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 5:48 PM EDT
Updated: Saturday, August 9, 2008 6:03 PM EDT
Attorneys General come and go, but the great SRA coverup remains
Topic: SRA/Prisoner abuse
"Attorney General Michael Mukasey has appointed a known supporter of the Bush administration’s torture policies as his chief of staff. Brian Benczkowski has previously argued that US interrogators aren’t practicing torture if they are solely acting to prevent an attack and not intending to humiliate or cause harm. In a previously undisclosed letter, Benczkowski writes: 'The fact that an act is undertaken to prevent a threatened terrorist attack, rather than for the purpose of humiliation or abuse, would be relevant to a reasonable observer in measuring the outrageousness of the act.'" from Mukasey Appoints Torture Backer as Chief of Staff
Oh, Brian, you little devil, you! Why would you go out of your way to deny that "enhanced interrogation" is SRA, if not for the purpose of taking the opportunity to tell a big lie?
Posted by fakeapoc
at 1:07 PM EDT
Friday, August 8, 2008
Revised website
See the Revisions page.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 7:41 PM EDT
Updated: Friday, August 8, 2008 7:43 PM EDT
Blind, deaf, and dumb faith
Once again, even as we wonder at the self-destructive behavior of youth, the ultimate meaninglessness of life is proclaimed in an article entitled Tiny Teeth of Ape and Human Ancestor Found in India. (Well, if Darwinism is correct, as this article essentially asserts, and evolution is driven by random mutations and natural selection, then life would have all the meaning of white noise. So, it would only be logical to conclude that the only rational thing to do would be to have as much fun as possible, and then commit suicide.) How many times has Darwinism, a religion posing as science, been debunked? Yet its adherents continue to claim that humans evolved from lower forms of life. If they want to spend their own money "studying" how the impossible supposedly happened, fine, but public science funding should be reserved for real science which advances us and helps us to recognize our true place in the universe - as opposed to degrading us into monkeys that have accidentally learned a few extra tricks and come our on the top of the heap. Paradoxically (from a Darwinian perspective), the purpose of life IS to evolve, but not in some random fashion. Currently, the evolutionary task of mankind in general is to develop our consciousness-soul, which is what allows us to think scientifically. LaRouche, who I am convinced is a sort of prophet for modern times (there have always been "guides" with advanced consciousness for mankind's benefit), has shown how the British Empire has sabotaged true science and replaced it with garbage such as Darwinism. Furthermore, just as he and his associates unearthed the American System which the British had buried very thoroughly, they have also unearthed the tradition of real science which the British also buried, and which we need to follow for the proper development of our consciousness, as well as for our progress in the physical world. Knowing this, how can anyone believe that the British Empire has mankind's best interests at heart?
Posted by fakeapoc
at 7:14 PM EDT
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Bush's next career: comedian
Topic: Perpetual warfare
Oh, that Bush just cracks me up! His latest routine about human rights in China has got to be one of his best yet. Don't be so sure that Conan's going to take over for Jay Leno.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 11:44 AM EDT
Updated: Friday, August 8, 2008 7:14 PM EDT
Newer | Latest | Older
|
|
|
