I've suggested that, since nuclear "non-state" terrorism will probably be required for any decent Apocalypse-parody, a situation could develop in Pakistan which would plausibly allow nuclear weapons to fall into the hands of Al Qaeda or other "Islamic terrorists."  (After what we've done to Iraq, heightened Islamic rage toward the US would be understandable, thus helping to pin the blame for such terrorism on whomever Cheney or his replacement British puppet wants to attack next.)

The news of Musharraf's resignation is ominous because, according to LaRouche, it will put the British terrorist-controllers in more influential positions.  In an effort to prevent it, LaRouche issued dire warnings in LaRouche: Musharraf's Outing Will Further Endanger Pakistani and Indian Security.   Once it occurred, he issued two statements, one contained in LaRouche Regrets Pakistani President Musharraf Resignation, a Saudi Triumph and Threat to Region and another in LaRouche Expresses Further regret at Musharraf Resignation.   

Posted by fakeapoc at 4:58 PM EDT

Updated: Friday, August 22, 2008 5:11 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

Based on the articles I read about the recent American Psychological Association meeting in Boston (200 protest psychologists' interrogation role , A push to ban psychologists' role in torture, all in attendance agreed that "enhanced interrogation" is interrogation, despite the lack of evidence to support this assertion.  This effectively "justifies" the process in the minds of many Americans, who are still convinced that there is such a thing a "Islamic terrorism," that the US government is waging war on it, that we have captured and interrogated terrorists, and that the process has yielded beneficial information. 

The truth, in my opinion, was expressed in numerical code by "protest" signs.  Just coincidentally, ALL of the signs mentioned in the articles I read can be converted to 11, the number of black magic, or multiples of it.  For example, "Do No Harm" converts to 88, which reflects not only black magic, but its ultimate goal - the 8th Sphere agenda, which "enhanced interrogation" is obviously intended to facilitate.  Also mentioned were the slogans "No Torture," which converts to 29 117, i.e. 11 9 (9/11) or 29 9=38=11 and "No Collaboration," which converts to 29 137 or 11 11.  

What I find most disgusting is groups which claim to be opposed to torture, but give it a back-handed "justification" by calling it "interrogation," while studying its effects and perhaps providing feedback to the torturers to help them fine-tune their diabolical craft.  If so, the only difference between them and those who support the participation of psychologists is their stated position. 

So, the protest and the coverage of it appears to have been choreographed to send both a back-handed "justification" and hints of the hideous actual purpose of "enhanced interrogation."  It's possible that they have "interrogated" a sufficient number of victims into a state of utter insanity to allow them to conduct experiments on how to turn such victims into slaves, and that there will be a show of discontinuing the practice, and perhaps some Congressional grandstanding and a pretense of doing the right thing just before the election. 

Posted by fakeapoc at 8:21 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

Although neither "bona fide" Presidential candidate (McCain, Obama) is kissing up to the overt "Apocalypse"-monger John Hagee, they did recently undergo an interview for the position by Rick Warren, who is regarded by some as Billy Graham's heir-apparent.  Warren's cheerleading for Armageddon might not be obvious, but it's implied as part of the Fundy belief system.  (Note that Bush's "Christianity" has faded into the background - once he was "re-elected," he had no more use for it, and I suppose he became somewhat of an embarrassment, after becoming a major war criminal.)

I've always thought that the title of Warren's book "The Purpose-Driven Life" was vague, since as one of God's creatures, even Wildebeests are driven by a purpose, albeit via instincts.  So, as is my habit when confronted with a nonsensical phrase upon which much emphasis is placed, I converted "purpose" to its numerical equivalent and obtained 110, i.e. 10x11, where 11 is the number of black magic.  I'll let you draw your own conclusion, but back in my more energetic days, I traced the origins of Christian Fundamentalism back to black magic, which also spawned the fantasy-based movement known as Satanism.  Of all the articles posted to my old website, those are the only ones that vanished before I backed them up, but the titles are still on my black magic page, and they provide a few clues.

Posted by fakeapoc at 3:45 PM EDT

Updated: Monday, August 18, 2008 3:52 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

from  Russian forces still entrenched in Georgia

"The United States and France said it appeared Russia was defying the truce already. Russian troops still controlled two Georgian cities and the key east-west highway between them Saturday, cities well outside the breakaway provinces where earlier fighting was focused.

"'From my point of view — and I am in contact with the French — the Russians are perhaps already not honoring their word,' U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said.

"U.S. President George W. Bush warned Russia Saturday that it cannot lay claim to the two separatist regions in U.S.-backed Georgia even though their sympathies lie with Moscow. 'There is no room for debate on this matter,' the president, with Rice, told reporters at his Texas ranch."

[end of excerpt]

No room for debate?  I guess Dubya's been hearing his god again - you know, the same one that told him to invade Iraq, which has gone so swimmingly.  And what better place to hear his god than on is ranch on a ley line, and on a full Moon to boot?

Posted by fakeapoc at 8:02 PM EDT

Updated: Saturday, August 16, 2008 8:06 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

from Bush tells Russia to get out of Georgia:

"Rice says the time had come to talk about the consequences Russia should suffer as a result of its actions in Georgia, yet she declined to possible repercussions it could face. 

"At the end, perhaps the only thing Russia will have proved is that 'they can use their overwhelming regional military power to beat up on a small neighbor,' she said.  ["Bring it on - well, not us personally, you dummies, but the American people."]

"'I don't think that's actually a very good place from which to proceed on an argument that Russia ought to be considered a responsible member of the international system.'" [end of excerpt]

With a Secretary of State who says things like that at a time when LaRouche is warning us that we must cooperate with Russia, China, and India to form a new, just global financial system, why are we worried about terrorists attacking us?  This conflict was clearly planned by the British to be unleashed at precisely this time in order to prevent cooperation, and possibly to unleash a world war. 

Posted by fakeapoc at 7:09 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

I don't  know where Gen. McCaffrey gets the idea that this "war on terror" is supposed to have ANY good outcomes.  According to McCaffrey: Afghanistan Disaster, Unless We Send in the Engineers,

"There is no military solution, McCaffrey writes: 'The atmosphere of terror cannot be countered mainly by military means. We cannot win through a war of attrition.... Afghanistan will not be solved by the addition of two or three more US combat brigades from our rapidly unraveling Army.'  [Before the war started, I said that one of its goals would be to destroy our military in many ways.  Not only that, but it has destroyed the lives of so many individual soldiers as well.  And for what, or rather, whom?] 

"Instead, McCaffrey argues that, in addition to building up the Afghan security forces, economic measures are also required. He calls for the deployment of a 'five battalion Army engineer brigade... to lead a five year road building effort employing Afghan contractors and training and mentoring Afghan engineers....'"

I gather that the good General didn't get a copy of the Cheney-Rumsfeld doctrine issued at the outset of the war.  (I find the aspects related to torture and "releasing the fiend within" [fiend, Nietzschean superman, demon, whatever] to be particularly enligntening.)

Not that it matters, since Britain, Satan, and their agents are going full speed ahead on their nuclear "Armageddon" project now that their bubble of monopoly-money is collapsing.  They can't wait around and risk that Congress will adopt LaRouche's solutions to the crash, despite the best efforts of Nancy Pelosi, the inflatable sex-doll of Babylon, to keep them in line.

Posted by fakeapoc at 7:10 PM EDT

Updated: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:15 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

There can be no comparison between what Russia is doing (with the overwhelming force which Colin Powell advocates as the best way to win the peace ASAP, instead of dragging it out and turning Georgia into a wasteland) to try to counteract British imperial destabilizations, and the Bush administration's relentless efforts throughout his term to unleash Hell on Earth, starting in Iraq.  Bush's warnings toward Russia, dripping with hypocrisy and sanctimony, are intended to provoke conflict, as usual.  I would expect nothing less of The War (on mankind) President (6 6 11), who would like nothing more than to be able to take credit for bringing-on the war to end all civilization disguised as "fulfilling prophecy." 

Posted by fakeapoc at 10:21 PM EDT

Updated: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:31 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink

It would seem that since there's so much resistance to an invasion of Iran, that the British decided to start the world war intended to lead up to "Armageddon" by pulling the trigger on another bomb they have carefully put in place for precisely such a situation.  But then, the threats of invading Iran might have been intended to draw our attention away from the actual plan.

The media, which has tried to cultivate such a reputation for objectivity after stampeding us into Iraq, is back at it again, stampeding us into a war with Russia, while trying to give the appearance of objectivity, precisely when cooperation with Russia is necessary to avert financial disaster (see Russians decry Western "propaganda" over crisis).   Then of course Obama and McCain are making Establishment-approved noises.  (Obama's moneybags Soros just happens to have been deeply involved in putting the aforementioned bomb in place.)  Can so many "experts' be wrong?  Well, they were last time.  Why not start listening to LaRouche, instead of Fox (= 666) Noise Channel and the rest of the war party's media, since your life probably depends on it?

Posted by fakeapoc at 7:46 PM EDT

Share This Post

Permalink