|
|
|
Satan's Fake Apocalypse
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Felix the rat whitewashes himself with an interview
Topic: Economics
Felix Rohatyn, the gentleman-banker who put Pinochet in power in Chile, recently gave an interview to Les Echos, a French business daily. It appears to me that the interview was intended to whitewash Rohatyn's image, which is which has been considerably tarnished by LaRouche, and to get us to go along with his plan by equating it with FDR's New Deal. Below, I "translate" portions of the interview, with comments and clarifications in brackets: Rohatyn: This crisis is different. She [comment - as if it has a mind of its own] is more dangerous and worrisome. More worrisome because we cannot clearly identify the problem neither measure its duration and scope. More dangerous: because it is hard to imagine solutions or remedies for the future. [He's hardly going to admit that he and his ilk deliberately created this crisis, or how bad it is (although they'll gradually admit how bad it is, as each stage becomes undeniable, to maintain their credibility). Nor will they allow any real solutions to be implemented, or as he put it previously: no more FDR's.]
[...]
Question: [comment - unaware, or pretending, that the central banks didn't deliberately create the problem] The central banks, can they save the situation? Rohatyn: Finance has been globalized and articulates around three poles: the United States, Europe and the Sino Japanese tandem. But the control structures, they, have not adapted. Taken separately, each central bank is too isolated and follows its own policy. America lowers its rates. Europe isn’t. We might need a more global regulator [financial dictator], capable of imposing rules [brutal austerity] and to speak with a single voice [universal fascism]. With Ben Bernanke and Jean-Claude Trichet, we have competent people [craven toadies] available. They take care of problems [put fingers in the dikes]. But it is nothing but a first phase to re-establish confidence [whitewash]. In purely American terms of regulation, we otherwise made a serious error abolishing the Glass-Steagall act that prevented retail banks to participate in investment banks. [Gosh, what a goof - nobody knew what would happen. LaRouche? Never heard of him.] [Rohatyn's subsequent call for massive investment in infrastructure is partly intended to portray himself as another FDR, and partly intended to deceive us into thinking that airports are the most critical infrastructure at this stage. They are important, but not as important as other types of infrastructure at this stage, and the order of development is critical to long-term success.] Question: Do you want to rehabilitate Keynes or do you want to revive the New Deal of Franklin D. Roosevelt? Rohatyn: While remaining a fervent capitalist [userer], I never have hidden the fact that I was a Keynesian [Keynesianism is a term for the indiscriminate or pernicious issuance of credit by privately-controlled ("independent") central banks, such as for housing bubbles; see pertinent segment of Shaping Campaign Policy: Sedate That Accountant!] and when I [reflect upon the current financial condition of] the United States, I regret that the Keynesians are a minority [but fortunately they're in positions where they can wreak havoc, such as Fed Chairman "Helicopter" Ben Bernanke]. We have a tendency to forget it, but, with the New Deal, Roosevelt probably saved capitalism. Without his intervention during the great crisis of the 1930s, America could have gone over to socialism. [This shows what a rat Rohatyn is. A war mobilization is a sort of Communism. The New Deal WAS a form of "socialism," based on the General Welfare clause of the Constitution, more properly known as the American System, albeit in a diluted form. FDR intended to DISMANTLE "capitalism," i.e. the British Empire, which is based on private finance and manipulation of national economies to the whims of the financial oligarchy, through the central banks. FDR is an enigma to me, but I currently believe that he truly intended to liberate mankind from the British Empire, but in the end was used by it to destroy Europe and to enable a stealth-fascist takeover of (and mindwar against) the US via British subversion of American intelligence agencies created during the war.] Today we are [generally] hostile towards state intervention ..., [which is unthinkingly associated with gross inefficiency]. But the current deregulations prove that one cannot rely entirely on the market! [But Rohatyn and his ilk ARE "the market."] In a nation where bridges collapse, where roads are falling apart, where a [hurricane] such as Katrina destroys New Orleans and become the symbol of the impotence of the government, how can one still pretend that the state cannot play a positive role? [Here again, he gives lip service to a popular idea, but has no intention of allowing the implementation of large-scale development of cost-effective infrastructure at low interest rates without onerous direct-user fees.] The New Deal has proven that the government could intervene without denaturalizing the system [mainly because it was a partial implementation OF the American System]. Today we need a new New Deal [i.e., his version of "the New Deal" - fascist economics a la Mussolini].
[...]
Our aim is simple: we want America to have some kind of domestic version of the World Bank, a bank which could then raise funds and lend money to finance great projects. She never would lend more then 50% of the investment in order to maintain a strong relation to the private sector. This will not happen overnight but our proposition is getting more and more an object of debate. We’re advancing. [The British-Empire-controlled World Bank turned everything it touched into crap as intended. The variation mentioned by Rohatyn, in my opinion, is probably intended to give the impression that Rohatyn has a solution, in order to keep us from searching for one elsewhere.] Well, the rest of the interview is more of the same, but worse, so I'll let those who are sufficiently interested in Rohatyn's exercise in deception wade through it on their own. If prosperity and environmental protection are the goals, then you want LaRouche's plan. If turning Earth into a playground for fascists, like Iraq, is your goal, let yourself be seduced by Rohatyn's Madam Speaker Pelosi.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 8:08 PM EST
Two more intriguing organization-names
The individual most responsible for unleashing Satanism on Iraq is Tony Blair, Cheney's superior in the British Empire, and a member of the Fabian Society. It just so happens that Fabian converts to 33, and Society converts to 96. Together, they yield 696, which by rotating the 9 converts to 666. Another group of vile creatures from the British Empire created an organization known as the Ghost Society. Ghost converts to 69, which combined with Society (96) again yields 666. Coincidence? You be the judge.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 10:28 AM EST
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Thursday, February 28, 2008
The Devil in "Iraqi Freedom"
Topic: Satanism/SRA
Just after posting the previous post, the phrases "Operation Iraqi Freedom" and "Operation Enduring Freedom" popped up on the news, so naturally I checked them out and with sickening predictability found that they confirmed that those who designed these "wars of liberation" also see them as Satanism on a vast scale. "Iraqi" > (converts to) 45 > 9, and "freedom" > 66. So, "Iraqi Freedom" > 966, which when the 9 is rotated 180 (6x30) degrees, yields 666. Through a similar complex mathematical process, "Enduring Freedom" is found to yield 11 66. Also note that "enduring" implies "perpetual." Fittingly, one of the more trustworthy source of information on the state of affairs from the average "liberated" Iraqi's perspective, Dahr Jamail and his reporters (who blend in well and have managed to avoid being murdered by those with a vested interest in feeding us only lies), have recently published an article entitled Baquba Losing Life – and Hope.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 6:24 PM EST
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
The Devil in "counter-insurgency"
If you wanted to disguise the process of torturing an entire country to death as a defensive measure, you couldn't do much better than what the US military, under the mis-leadership of Synarchist toadies and contaminated by a Satanist faction, is doing in Iraq. Many US soldiers are also being intentionally victimized by this war, as part of the Synarchist war against the US, which includes destroying the lives of its well-intentioned soldiers. So, to make the US campaign of mass torture-murder look good, the military, like Blackwater, claims it is under attack, and that it is laying siege to one city after another in defense, when in fact it is simply attacking each city without provocation, or "in response" to some contrived black-ops incident such as the one in which four Blackwater solders were sacrificed to "explain" the assault on Falluja, or "9/11" itself. The 9/17/07 rampage by Blackwater thugs, in which they shot up an area in Baghdad and claimed to be responding to insurgents, is an excellent symbol for this "counter-insurgency" process. This is what the US calls "counter-insurgency." This term "counter-insurgency," when converted to its numerical equivalent, yields intriguing results: "Counter" converts to 96, "insurgency" to 135 (which in turn converts to 9) and "counterinsurgency" converts to 231, which in turn converts to 6. Counter-insurgency, therefore, can be read as 96-6, i.e. 666, i.e. a means of serving el Diablo. Also note that the diabolical John Rawlings Rees called his war on the higher soul (the Self) "counterinsurgency." George Orwell, who was aware of the hideous true nature of Rees' crusade, characterized it in 1984 as the "Obliteration of the Self," which is how it is perceived from a physical perspective. In fact, it is being given such a fear and loathing for Earth life that it dissociates itself, or flees into fantasy, and might decide to take a detour into the 8th Sphere during the process of its next reincarnation. The intended result is the obliteration of mankind, the crown of Creation (a work in progress). Is that evil, or what? Satanists might think that they wouldn't be affected by the destruction of the human race, since they're supermen, "beyond good and evil," or so Satan told them through such instruments as Nietzsche. But he just wants their bodies, and will say anything to get them.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 8:39 PM EST
Updated: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 8:50 PM EST
Monday, February 25, 2008
Giant corporation supports Nader's bid to put Bloomberg in power as first American Mussolini
Topic: Politics
Well, Mr. Anti-Corporation WAS on Meet the Press (2/24), and NBC is a subsidiary of GE. How many times was LaRouche given the opportunity? The fact is, as LaRouche has exposed, that Nader is another creature from the Synarchist zoo: "Anyone who doubts that the Nader operation is a left-synarchist fascist operation, in support of the very same genocidal program as the Cheney-Bush regime, should read this report carefully." from LaRouche Youth Expose Naderites as Fascists In this case, his goal will be to somehow be to help tip the Democratic race in favor of Obama, who will then be destroyed along with McCain by the media as it ushers Michael Bloomberg in on a white horse to "rescue" us from the economic disaster which their masters engineered.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 10:25 AM EST
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
"Bribery! Why didn't we think of that before?"
Topic: SRA/Prisoner abuse
"In the predawn hours of Jan. 29, a CIA Predator aircraft flew in a slow arc above the Pakistani town of Mir Ali. The drone's operator, relying on information secretly passed to the CIA by local informants, clicked a computer mouse and sent the first of two Hellfire missiles hurtling toward a cluster of mud-brick buildings a few miles from the town center. "The missiles killed Abu Laith al-Libi, a senior al-Qaeda commander and a man who had repeatedly eluded the CIA's dragnet." from U.S. strikes within Pakistan — without notice
Unilateral attack on al-Qaeda commander called a model for operations
So the CIA finally got some useful information - through bribery. That must mean they'll be closing down Gitmo soon, right?
Posted by fakeapoc
at 10:33 AM EST
Monday, February 18, 2008
Fascism in the works: Are they not telling us something about the economy?
Topic: Economics
The fact that, as LaRouche has made so abundantly clear, NYC Mayor Bloomberg is being groomed as the first American Mussolini, seems to indicate that the economy is not quite as sound as Dubya would have us believe. 
Felix Rohatyn to Bloomberg and Schwarzenegger: "I just love balancing budgets, and luckily Greenspan gave us plenty of it to do!" Talk about your red ink!
Posted by fakeapoc
at 6:39 PM EST
Added section to website
Topic: 8th Sphere agenda
I'ved added a new section, Big Brother's Neighborhood, to my site.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 6:37 PM EST
NIU shooter's hard drive "missing"
Topic: Video games
As in the Virginia Tech massacre-case, the hard drive for the killer's computer has "disappeared": DEKALB, Illinois (CNN) -- A laptop computer seized from a DeKalb motel and believed to be connected to Thursday's deadly shooting at Northern Illinois University had no hard drive, federal officials said Saturday. Police confiscated a laptop computer from a room at this DeKalb, Illinois, motel, its manager said. 1 of 3 DeKalb Travelodge manager Jay Patel said police confiscated a Toshiba laptop computer from Room 105. Steven Kazmierczak, 27, killed five students and himself Thursday in a lecture hall on the university campus in DeKalb, west of Chicago. The motive behind the shooting spree remains unknown. from Laptop taken in campus shooting probe is missing hard drive The simple fact that the hard drive is "missing" is a pretty good indication that they know the motive, but they don't want us to know. According to LaRouche PAC, however, his roommates have spilled the beans, and it turns out that he was an avid player of violent video games. Obviously, the connection between these games and such extremely violent incidents is being hidden by low people in high places. In other words, LaRouche was right - again.
Posted by fakeapoc
at 6:32 PM EST
Updated: Monday, February 18, 2008 6:36 PM EST
Newer | Latest | Older
|
|
|
